Clinical trial documents: consistency with the protocol, every time.
Clinical trials generate large volumes of controlled documents — protocols, consent forms, case report forms, deviation logs, study reports. AI tools now draft and check them. Every document must be consistent with the protocol and good clinical practice, and small inconsistencies can matter a great deal.

What we plan to cover
| Area | Example judgment |
|---|---|
| Protocol consistency | Does this document match the protocol's procedures and schedule? |
| Deviation classification | Is this a protocol deviation, and how serious? |
| Consent documents | Are required elements present and consistent? |
| Data entry checks | Is the case report form entry consistent with source rules? |
Boundaries
Documentation against protocol and published standards only — never clinical judgment about patients. Synthetic documents only. What we do and don't test.
Professionals
Clinical research associates, medical writers and quality specialists (recruited, with partner organisations, as the domain opens).
Clinical document AI testing — FAQ
Which documents would be tested?+
Protocols, consent forms, case report forms and deviation logs, checked for consistency with the protocol.
Would you assess patient care?+
No. Documentation only, against protocol and published standards.
Would real trial documents be used?+
No. All documents would be synthetic.
Zynoviq